|
I’d love to see an explosive pull; explosives expand, the only way you could get the outer walls to move inward would for the explosives to be outside the walls. Controlled demolitions do not slowly pull the outer supports inwards for the last few minutes, explosions are quick, not slow acting, constant pulling forces. Furthermore, controlled demolitions are designed to sever the main supports and let gravity do the work at pulling the building down. The reason controlled demolitions don’t tip (too much) is because the lateral forces on the building are nothing compared to the force needed to accelerate the building laterally, as apposed to gravity which is much stronger. a controlled demolitions could produce the falling effect we see with the building, so could the collapse of a floor due to fire, however, with explosives, there would be explosive residue, and other tell tail signs of explosives. Also, controlled demos are designed to be used on the lower levels, which we don’t see in the collapse of the WTC. However, it is possible that the people who orchestrated it (putting words in your mouth, I don’t think this is what happened) knew that by removing support to a floor or 2 would bring the entire tower down because of the design flaws. But this is overcomplicating it, it has been shown time and time again in simulations that steel trusses, with there fire proofing reduce or removed, will heat, expand, and distort so that they lose the structural integrity.
__________________
Donate Blood!
"Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen
|