Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FoolThemAll
.....But as for personal life, crimes aside, I don't see the relevance. (Feel free to make a reference to Ken Starr here!)
And I'm not seeing how a politician who represents social conservatives Christians and votes in a socially conservative manner doesn't best represent social conservatives' needs. Yes, even if he's closeted.
|
Did anyone who Ken Starr targeted for investigation (...and then permit the leaking, from his office; the details of the investigation to the press....vs. what we is the proper and discrete conduct of special counsel Fitzgerald's office, over the past 3 years....)....a $71 million, 6 year investigation of a profitless real estate "deal" that resulted in no finding of wrongdoing on the part of the original targets....the POTUS and the first lady, <b>draft, co-sponsor, or promote legislation or a contitutional amendment to curtail rights or potential to achieve rights.....of anyone who engaged in extramarital sexual activity?</b>
FoolThemAll, I have a reputation here for posting verifiable information that many have never been exposed to....I endeavor to share what I've learned; what has shaped my opinion. Since you are not using your posts to share how you come to "know, what you "know", you leave me only with a suspicion that your "Ken Starr" reference is what "you know", and that it is representative of your best effort to share what has influenced your thinking. with the rest of us.