Dilbert1234567

First, the plane was tiny, second it was not going nearly as fast, third it does not carry nearly as much fuel, fourth, and the construction of the building is entirely different. These 2 situations are completely different. It’s just as asinine as saying my Sherman tank was barley damage when it was rear ended by the Volvo going 20 mph so my mini van should be ok when it is hit by a bus going 120 mph.

as for the hole in the basement in WTC 6, each of the buildings had huge massive diesel generators in the basement, but no, explosives would not create a hole like that, its again asinine to think that an explosion would make that hole, a blast that would cause that hole would have thrown debris for miles and blown windows for blocks, again, these people have no clue about explosives.

Taking the event as a hole, it’s much easier to believe that some pissed off Muslims hijacked planes and crashed them into towers then some big elaborate scheme orchestrated and covered up by a bunch of idiots in the government. Why is it so hard to think people in the world don’t like us? Why must you create bogymen, the world is scary enough as it is with out fictitious enemies. Everyone in power would have to be in on the plot, or someone in an office would raise a stink about it. Don’t you think the democrats that are trying to get back in power would cry foul about the investigation, about a cover-up? Do you actually think everyone is involved? If its so obvious to even you, shouldn’t it be obvious to everyone else? Its not obvious to everyone else because there is nothing else here, there were no explosives, there was no cruise missile, just a bunch of pissed off Muslims in planes. Lastly, it is not a bunch of improbable events:

Gaining entry into the country is easy as pie, fake visa, fake what ever, its easy. Second, getting flight training is easy, only takes money. Third sneaking weapons onto planes, piece of cake, I’ve seen poly carbonate knives that are completely non metal, and a razor blade does not contain enough metal to be picked up by lax metal detectors, my steel toe boots never set off an alarm before 9/11, a little blade wont either. Hijacking a plane is easy too, before 9/11, the doctrine for a hijacking was to fly to comply until it was over, no one thought they would use the planes as weapons, the flight crew was probably told they would not be harmed if they cooperated, them, kicked out of the cock pit and then its all over. So what is the probability of the building collapsing, 5%, 50%, 100% we don’t know, there was definitely a chance, and large or small they did collapse, we either were very unlucky, or luck may have had nothing to do with it, bottom line, is there were no explosives found in the building, no residue, no traces, no damage resembling blasts. However, there were plenty of warped girders. There is no evidence to support an explosion, except a few photos that look like blast are going off, but those could be caused by other things too, such as the compacting air. I don’t see why this is so hard for you, it’s pretty damn obvious. Sure there are small things that don’t quite fit, but they are small, just like with the theory of evolution, small parts don’t fit, so the theory is adjusted to match the evidence, just like 9/11. The theory was adjusted to fit the evidence, the hijackers that were allegedly still alive, liars, or crappy intelligence. This still does not change the fact that planes were hijacked and crashed into the towers.

__________________
Donate Blood!

"Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen