I don't know what you're on about, elphaba, because nothing you quoted and bolded the shit out of contradicts anything I said or proves I was incorrect about anything.
The points you so boldly announce as correct in the first few quotes were never contested to begin with.
However...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Elphaba
...nor is it "illegal" to do so. But what is missing in this scenerio, once again, is the intension of the signer. If fraud is intended, it will be treated as fraud.
|
The only person missing anything is you, i.e. where I typed:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by analog
I then said, "certainly if they are denying the charges?" to which she replied, "well if you made the purchase and then deny the charge, that is fraud no matter what you sign."
|
I also said so in my post #40. So yes, if it's intended to be fraud, then it will be treated as such. Obviously.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Elphaba
If you want to be immature by using goofy names to amuse yourself, you risk the chance of sharp eyes catching it, and killing your card.
|
Well isn't that something... in just
one post you go from ignoring what i'm typing and missing important things you later try to call me on, to putting extra words in that I never typed to begin with. How novel!
Did I ever say I put "Elmer Fudd" as a signature? Did I ever say I put a fake name of any kind as a signature? Nope. Sure didn't.
Nice flame, though.
(...and what's up with all the bolding? Chill out.)