Quote:
Originally Posted by hagatha
There's a good reason incest is wrong, biologically its unsound and weakens the species. Comparing incest to gay unions is, in my opinion, corrupting the concept of love and relationships. Biologically homosexuality makes a lot of sense in terms of keeping the population in tact, incest makes none. And why can't a father just love and protect his kids without it being sexual? Its incredibly selfish on his part to take on the role of lover in his daughter's life. She obviously has some issues to deal with as well.
It is, overall, a very "ewy" situation.
|
The fart in the submarine here, which no one mentions, but everyone is aware of, is that if this father and daughter don't reproduce, every argument made to justify homosexual relationships applies.
Why is it anyone else's business? Consenting adults. They can adopt.
Conversely, many, if not most on the right would say that homosexuality also corrupts the concept of love and relationships. It's a classic case of not being able to have it both ways, especially if you are homosexual and judging these two.
What was the reason homosexuality keeps the population intact?