Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JinnKai
Despite your protests to the contrary, you didn't start this thread to learn. I've read about 15 different "solutions" that didn't involve cutting labor, and that's exactly what you wanted.
|
Please be advised before reading further, Ace is about to come to another conclusion.
Instead of a focus on what is stated, it appears that generally people who disagree with me are more interested in trying to anticipate my intent, and think they have the ability to read minds.
Quote:
|
You didn't post your solution because you WANTED to bait people into avoiding labor reduction. "Look at those silly liberals.. they won't even fire people to save the sinking ship."
|
I am not sure anyone ever expressed interest in my "solution".
On what basis are you saying I have baited people? How do you bait people with open-ended questions to a simplistic scenerio? I am interested an how liberals explain crticism of business when a business relocates operations to lower cost areas when the liberal would do the same given the same information. that question is not baiting, in my view it is very direct. If I got an answer, it would be informative, and worth the effort.
Quote:
|
If you really wanted to "learn," you'd deign that your presentation is flawed and that forcing labor reductions is an artifical construction. But you won't -- we're just denying your perfect little situation, huh?
|
Yes many have said the Op scerio is flawed. I acknowledge its limitations. I have even asked how to make it better. I think I have asked several times. If I have missed the answer please let me know.