View Single Post
Old 10-03-2006, 06:59 AM   #141 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
there are all kinds of scenarios that would render the firepower of a vertically organized military more or less useless.
faced with the outcomes of a legitimation crisis of any real proportions, statements like "we have guns" would be about as functional as the wolfowitz "plan" was for iraq.
such statements reflect little beyond simple-minded arrogance.

the question is not whether and insurrection could happen, but rather which one--which ideology would be used, what the goals would be, how these goals would be reflected in organizational structure, etc.

mass actions do not just happen.
they are not purely spontaneous.
historically, mass actions have articulated themselves around available discourses, have taken them over and reworked them practically as they fashion themselves as movements.

it is not obvious that the logic of civil war leading to revolution is rational.
the history of the revolutionary tradition has shown this pretty clearly: if you think about revolution as a military operation, you tend to get military organizations runing the show. when they get power, they impose their internal logic on the situation they come to control. so the notion of a revolution organized around small armed groups is problematic in itself--but the trick is the politics of that organization...
a far more effective strategy would involve a variant of the general strike.
a very large, entirely peaceful withdrawl of consent could bring any government to its knees.
no amount of weaponry would make any difference: who would you shoot at? everyone? and what makes anyone think that the military would be outside of such an action?
any action on the part of the state is such a context would simply speed its implosion.

the only real problem from my viewpoint is that there is no revolutionary politics that offers anything like a coherent countermodel to the existing order. i would entirely oppose any rightwing nationalist action. further, i do not think such an action would be able to gather any meaningful support--the bush squad has already stolen the thunder of such politics, and a rightwing movement would offer nothing but more of the same.

in the end, the right faces the problems that the left has been dealing with for quite a long time--the hollowing out of its rhetoric, the collapse of any meaningful purchase of the terminology it relies upon.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360