Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
From my experience, knowing social liberals, they tend to run a business pretty much the same as any conservative. I think, based on what I've seen, they are slower to fire incompetent employees, but interestingly seem to pay less well than the conservative owners. This is based on a sample size of about 5 so really has no validity beyond personal experience.
|
The ability to fire imcompentence has nothing to do with politics, only the ability to recognize performance and act accordingly. And the social liberals that I know (me, girlfriend, other friends) all tend to pay more then our peer businesses. I suspect owners that want to succeed know the value of labor and pay accordingly. Again, nothing to do with politics.
But I'm sure we can fit these type of decisions into political logic if we try hard enough!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aceventura3
What I have difficulty with is the notion that a corporation is often considered "bad" when the corporation does what it need to do to survive.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by boatin
If a corporation does anything it needs to survive, is that action justified? Is survival of the corporation the only goal?
|
Ace, I'd like your answer to the question I posed earlier. Any limitations you'd put actions corporations take?