View Single Post
Old 10-01-2006, 02:19 PM   #44 (permalink)
host
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
Would you cut wages/benefits across the board, or target certain employees? Do you ask for government assistance? Do you move operations where costs are lower? Do you require employees to do more? Do you make charges against your competition? Do you do the same thing that "big business" does all the time that makes them "bad"?

How do you fire someone with sensitivity? Does that mean you give them flowers, buy 'em dinner and say its me and not you, before you fire them? Or, do you simply tell them the truth?

P.S. - The point has been made. I fully understand the liberal approach to business - denial, rejection of potential problems, and the focus on trivial matters. I have a much better understanding of how great American companies started by hard driving conservative capitalist are driven to ruin when taken over by weak liberal "head in the sand" bureaucratic types. Thank you.
I was the managing partner for 7 years of a business with 17 employees. When I was not firing someone for "cause"....Cause is "no call, no show, theft of company property, etc....I always explained the dismissal as a workforce reduction, and offered the option of uncontested unemployment benefits.

I was faced with declining demand for our company's services and products, at times, and the nagging and rising cost of providing the traditional major benefits at that company, a defined benifit pension plan, and company payment of the entire family major medical benefit for each employee.

I never reduced wages....I went some months without drawing a paycheck, I only gave across the board pay increased to employees at the top pay scale (a workforce primarily of skilled craftsmen) two times in the seven year period, and I changed the costly defined benefit pension plan to a 401(k) plan, offsetting some of the loss of benefits that older workers would have received under the defined benefit plan.....by offering a 100 percent company paid match to all employee personal 401(k) contributions.

After the longest period of being unable to offer wage increases, I designed and debuted a successful, "gain sharing" incentive plan to increase productivity and efficiency, and I increased advertising budgets and invested in equipment and methods to increase both the perception and the reality of market leading, "quality work", in our industry and in the minds of potential customers.

I was active in managing and promoting the trade assoc. in my industry, regionally, and on a state level. I was an officer in the local assoc. and a delegate to the state assoc. I helped draft lobbying strategies and met with the lobbyist for our state assoc. to isolate and plan "pitches" for "make or break issues. On a local level, I shared cost and pricing info and business strategy with competitiors who were fellow trade association members, to successfully educate craftsmen turned business owners about the economics of their businesses, and the importance of offering guarantees to customers and fair wages and benefits to employees to influence "realistic" pricing, across the local industry.

Competitors who were non-members, were often encouraged to join our trade association. If seven years is enough of a measure of successfully lowering costs and maintaining the value of wages and benefits to workers, in a period of declining and or static revenues and profits, I succeeded without "help from the government". Taxes, licensing fees, accounting fees for the business and it's pension plans, increasing government regulation and health care costs all were aggravating, but they were equal challenges for all "top tier" competitors, as well. My business was located in a high cost, highly regulated state, but that also meant access to a pool of higher income customers, an above average population concentration, and a large pool of potentially educated and qualified workers.

None of what I experienced influenced me to be "more conservative or libertarian." I am still bitter, though, about the "Harry and Louise" "hit job" by big insurance and partisan republicans who derailed the Clinton "health reform" plan. All of the small business owners who I knew then, who were burdened by the high cost of company paid employee health benefits, were disappointed by the propaganda "blitz" that permanently shifted the profit advantage to competitors who paid little or no employee health benefits, in 1993....and since.
host is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360