View Single Post
Old 09-29-2006, 08:51 PM   #13 (permalink)
Baraka_Guru
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlatan
Baraka... then I'm not sure what the issue is other than to maintain the course we are on.

We are not in Iraq (thankfully). We are in Afghanistan under the aegis of NATO. We are not part of the "coalition of the willing".

We became involved in Iraq as support for a larger cause than just US interests. It was an invasion that had the support of the UN and was later handed over to NATO.

Quite frankly, if the US had have stayed focused on Afghanistan and not entered the completely unrelated Iraq, I would have a lot more sympathy with the US, "war on terror". As it stands, "the war on terror" is little more than a marketing ploy to make palatable what the current US admin's goal of invading Iraq (I tend to believe they would have found an excuse to do it regardless of 9/11).
This is what I'm trying to say. (It's been a long week.) And this is the reason why our government needs to keep open dialogue as to why we're in Afghanistan and just when it is we can leave. I guess I'm worried that after Afghanistan, the Americans will expect too much from us somewhere else.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlatan
NATO holds that if one nation is attacked, we are all attacked and will fight on behalf of the injured party - in this case, the U.S., but the larger picture is that NATO as a whole was attacked by the coalition of Al-Qaeda and the Taliban.
This is true and is why we are committed to Afghanistan. But note that NATO responsibilities are not purely aggressive, it's role is to use force only where necessary. I'm stating the obvious--I'm sure you know this about the treaty--but this is the kind of open dialogue our government should maintain. NATO's strength also lies in security and other modes of support.

* * *

Senator Dallaire recently supported the mission in Afghanistan, but he also expressed a general concern over our role as peacekeepers, saying that it seems like a thing of the past. This is something we need to re-evaluate once things stabilize in Afghanistan and our forces become freed up. Think of the long term. I don't want Canada to join the witch hunt for "evil" simply because we have the capacity.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360