Quote:
Originally Posted by fastom
Well Dil is at least partly on the right track. The Presi-dunce is responsible for the lack of followup... c'mon it's like a bad joke. Get in a car accident that draws blood and you ain't moving the car till they investigate. Here they shovel the whole friggin' works off to the dump... no, worse... they send it to be recycled... destroyed. So that nobody will ever find out the truth. We can point out inconsistancies, we can scoff at their lame explanations but actual prove-it-in-court evidence was destroyed.
That is not by accident or oversight. It's criminal contempt.
|
…and just plain wrong; the last of the steel was removed in may 2002, and Dr W. Gene Corley, head of the Building Performance Assessment Team said they had plenty of time
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr W. Gene Corley, head of the Building Performance Assessment Team
"There has been some concern expressed by others that the work of the team has been hampered because debris was removed from the site and has subsequently been processed for recycling. This is not the case. The team has had full access to the scrap yards and to the site and has been able to obtain numerous samples. At this point there is no indication that having access to each piece of steel from the World Trade Center would make a significant difference to understanding the performance of the structures".
|
http://www.911myths.com/html/recycled_steel.html