View Single Post
Old 09-29-2006, 03:54 AM   #28 (permalink)
ubertuber
spudly
 
ubertuber's Avatar
 
Location: Ellay
^ Host, please edit the above post so that it has SOMETHING to do with the thread. The entirety of that post could have been contained within these two sentences:

Quote:
Originally Posted by hot
If the POTUS was trustworthy and competent, I would object to the passing of the "Detainee" anit-"terror", bill, out of concern that a future, less ethical or credible president might abuse these new "powers". It defies credulity that congress would transfer such unmonitored and unchecked extra-constitutional discretion and detention and prosecutorial authority to officials who have such a high probability of being felons, traitors, and war criminals, themselves!
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam
ubertuber is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73