|
Sure, it's certainly a prudent business decision. But the fact that it's prudent to not offend a group because they very well may kill you is a sad event. Whether it's because of religious extremists, Nazis, the mob, or gangs.
Sure, a group could take a stand--and count the cost if they aren't backed to the nines with security.
But on the other hand, to bow to the threats, to allow anarchists (sp?) to dictate business decisions, cultural events etc...gives them the upper hand.
All the outrage displayed by The Names is all well and good, but it'd be much more effective if they said, "This is an outrage, and I am going to contribute to/ensure a high-security environment where art can continue unabated!"
Otherwise, I can't help but think that yes, this decision of the theater is likely saving lives.
__________________
"Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra and then suddenly it flips over, pinning you underneath.
At night, the ice weasels come." -
Matt Groening
My goal? To fulfill my potential.
|