Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sticky
Suppose (2) there was a conspiracy, however, to get an answer to the American Public, to put faces on the murderers and create an enemy, and maybe even to provide just cause for the invasion of Afganistan to go after Bin Laden. Please, just suppose that was also the case for a second.
|
I do believe there are a lot of questions revolving the US invading Iraq, I firmly believe some levels of our government knew they did not have a credible argument for invasion, but by selectively showing the evidence, we went anyways. I still think it is more plausible, that some one in the intelligence screwed it up, either IDing the wrong man, or being fooled by fake ID's and counter intelligence.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Fatsom's BBC atrticle covers it quite well. These are the men implicated in the attacks, and these men are still alive. Several of them HAVE gone on TV in the ME, and have been identified by friends. What this suggests is there was identity theft, and we still have absolutely no idea who supposedly hijacked the planes. What does this imply? Well, it implies that a great deal of evidence surround the attack is suspect, specifically the intel on the motives and capabilities of the supposed hijackers. Even the links to OBL would have to be in question if we had no idea who the hijackers were.
|
yes I do think some of the intel may be wrong, but most is right, I think that some in our intelligence community either were fooled by fake id's (and aliases) or that they confused 2 people with the same name, and gathered intel on both people thinking they were one in the same.