Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
Well, it turns out the Boston Globe was on the ball that morning. They got a flight manifest from AA, and made a nice pretty graphic too:
http://graphics.boston.com/news/pack...1_manifest.gif
What do we have, all the suspected terrorist are on the list, in the correct seat, don’t you think if they were not on the manifest they received, they’d cry foul? Or do we add the Boston Globe to the list of conspirators now too. |
You're doing a lot of good research, Dilbert, something that the Boston Globe should try doing. Look at the graphic. Look at the names of the suspected terrorists. Guess how many of them are still alive?
Waleed M. Alshehri, Wail M. Alshehri, and Abdulaziz Alomari are all still alive as of today. So not only did a passport survive the crash, but these men did too. Were they in the debris flying out the window? Did they fall into a giant truck hauling pillows, in some odd cartoonish coincedence? Doubtful.
Now I must ask you: if the Boston Globe is found to be severly lacking in the investigative department, so much so that they are completly wrong about 3/5 of the terrorists on Flight 11, is it possible that other newspapers and media outlets are wrong aswell? Is it possible that they simply took the government's word as gospel and didn't ask the right questions?