Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shakran
OK. You're wrong, but we'll agree to disagree.
Yes, that would be why I said EXCEPT for first gear we don't need synchros.
Nice try, but I'm gonna call you out here. To be quite frank, an experienced mechanic would realize that moving parts wear. If you put more strain on a moving part it will wear faster. Therefore if you require the synchros to do more work, they will wear faster. If you take work away from the synchros and do it manually, they will wear slower. It doesn't get much simpler than that.
|
I will end my postings here... Call me "out" all you want...now sure exactly what you mean. But I have been working on transmissions for most of my life, and have extensive experience and knowledge in the areas of manual and automatics. We disagree, yes, but your statement that I am "Wrong" is disrespectfull, and not called for. Just because YOU do not agree with my experience, doesn't mean you can generically call me wrong. If I am so wrong, why have I been able to successfully earn a living doing what I have been doing for all these years? The numbers do not lie. I back every one of my statements with personal EXPERIENCE, not information from 3rd parties. If you want to say you disagree, fine, but lets leave it at that, for I have never stated in ANY of my posts that you, or anyone else was "wrong", just that I disagree.
