Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
will what do you think of our explination of the passport so far.
|
The passport was one that belonged to one of the terrorists, Satam Al Suqami (not Atta, a common mistake). The passport was in such good condition that they were able to see the picture of the man and read his name clearly. The core of the North Tower (WTC 1), the tower that Satam Al Suqami's plant hit, absorbed almost all of the airplane. The plane hit nearly the exact center of the building heading straight on. The only part of the plane that exited the building was the landing gear that landed near West St.
In the WTC 2, South Tower crash, the plane did not hit in a central location and because of this landing gear, and engine and part of the fuseloge were found on the top of WTC 5 and a few blocks away near the corner of Church and Park.
The reason I am very skeptical about the passport should be clear. No luggage from the plane, be it carry on or stowed away, was recovered. Nothing. Not an iPod, not a Samsonite bag, not a ticket. Nothing. And yet, depiste being in a horrific crash, and seeing temperatures that we can't even agree on (certianally hot enough to burn paper, I sure we can agree), this passport survived unharmed. The passport should have been inside of some luggage, a pocket; somewhere other than being out in the open. The passport was found inside no container, though. We also do not know the identity of the person who found the passport,
as it is classified. Please feel free to call the FBI to confirm. The passport has not been seen by any members of the AP. The story was covered by ABC on 9/12/01, though it has been subsequently removed from the website. Luckly, it has been
cashed by another website.