Quote:
Originally Posted by _God_
Serious question, no sarcasm intended or implied:
How many times would Hizbollah have to shoot at Israel (or how many Israelis would have to die their hands) before you would consider that a military response from Israel would be warranted?
|
Alright, I'll give you a straight answer. Israel does not have the right to occupy a country. Israel does not have the right to attack all of Lebanon because of a few extreemists. How many times would Hezbollah have to shoot at Israel before I would consider a military response warrented? Well
that depends on the response (which is what I was getting at in my first response). Had Israel gone to the Lebanese government with a plan to work together to remove the Hezbollah, it would have been great. If Israel would have sent in a few military officers to take out the kidnappers, it would have been acceptable. Israel destroyed South Lebanon. That was wrong, and I cannot give you a number of times Hezbollah would have to shoot at Israel, because infinity isn't a number.
You asked for a number, God:
Quote:
Originally Posted by _God_
...how many times
|
then you corrected me for giving a number.