Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Marvelous Marv
host, this is insane, even for you. You have a RECORDING, in which Clinton says that Sudan had OBL, and immediately after that, he says, "I didn't want to bring him here."
Unless you have some REAL evidence that the recording is a forgery, contesting something that cut-and-dried just makes you look bad. Especially if you chose the words "I still don't see" because the recording is something you have to HEAR.
Edit: I'll grant you this. I do not accept Clinton's lame, years-later response that what he said in the recording was "factually inaccurate," in spite of all of the memory problems he and Hillary displayed over the years, under oath.
However, if you're saying that Clinton was "misinformed," then I'm sure we can expect a great deal more sympathy and understanding in regard to Niger and yellowcake.
|
Marv, Clinton's clarification, regarding his Feb., 2002 speech, is displayed as happening in June and in July 2004.
The 9/11 Commission, "bought it", and they could find nothing that contradicted it. I've provided corroborating statements from Clarke and from Tenet, that the "on a platter" offer from Sudan, did not happen, and from NY Times reporters who either confirmed the "no evidence" statement of the 9/11 Commission, or that Clarke was credible in his BUsh/situation room story, since the Times found three witnesses who backed his claim about Bush and Iraq.
,,,,,and you Marv, all you seem to have 4 years of repitition of the "recording" spin, about Clinton, from the entire chorus of wingers, drummed into your head, to the point that m info cannot fit next to it, let alone displace it!
....and you now demand "real proof", from me? SHEESH !