View Single Post
Old 09-23-2006, 02:43 PM   #8 (permalink)
ratbastid
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Definitions schmefinitions. Who really cares what you are--what matters is that you've got an agreement that works between you. And you survived a trial that would have ended weaker relationships. AND you're enjoying the benefits of communicating with each other on the level that non-monogamy demands.

There's a saying in the Polyamory community: there are as many different poly configurations as there are poly families. In other words, no two couples or "clumps" have the same rules or agreements. Yours are just as unique as everybody else's.

The only thing I'd say about this is: I generally align with the philosophies and attitudes of those who identify as polyamorous. But the polyamory community is largely made up of ren-fest geeks or grey-bearded hippies, which really isn't my demographic. So while I support and generally follow the beliefs of the community, I find myself slightly embarassed by the community. I wish there was a term for hip, urban 20- to 30-something people whose lifestyle and choices allow for multiple romances and lovers.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Gretsch Player
PS: By the way, I posted my concerns on the "off-topic" section of a libertarian/left-leaning political forum I frequent, and you would not believe the hatred and vitriol leveled against me from supposed non-traditionalists. Society is ill-equipped to handle people who have different ideas about marriage, I guess. They insisted I couldn't be happy. I said I was. My marriage is better now than it ever was. That is no exaggeration. Our marriage is stronger than it was even before she slept with that half-man.
I hear you completely. I had a lot of fun on Friday night telling lurkette all about the first date I had that afternoon. That was weird in itself--I haven't had a "date" in at least 15 years. But it went great, she's a really fun girl, and I'm looking forward to seeing her again. And I love that who lurkette and I are for each other is solid and stable enough that we can demonstrate that by allowing each other the freedom to explore.

It's definitely not how we're mostly raised to believe that relationships are "supposed" to be, though, so I generally think people's negative reactions are understandable, though unenlightened.
ratbastid is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360