Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
If you can show me anywhere in the constitution that allows for federal judges to be impeached AND executed I will happily retract my statement. "Due process"? The process you're describing is constitutionally impossible unless he's guilty of treason or espionage, and you've made no statements to that effect or presented any evidence of those crimes.
|
The word 'treason' does come to mind. How else could one consider rulings in direct opposition to the constitution? It's one thing to misinterpret the constitution like was done before 'incorporation', it's quite another to base decisions on what you think something should be and then twist the constitution to fit your decision.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
Face it, you literally called for the guy's head because you don't agree with his decisions, and it's very different than calling for his impeachment. Dk, I know you have a good working knowledge of the Constitution, and you should know all of this. That's my entire problem with this thread.
|
I'll ask the question again, how many times must a decision of his be overturned on the grounds that he based a decision on something that the constitution says otherwise before you impeach? If high treason against the constitution, which is the law of the land, were prosecuted with the same vigor and resulted in the same consequences as most other capital crimes, we'd have more judges ruling according to the constitution instead of redefining it in to something that doesn't resemble the original anymore. That's my entire problem with the government and those that support it.