So the NIST says it could have gone as high as 1800F? Well that's still a far cry from 1500C (2732F).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilbert
You don’t need explosives to explain its speed; the building is nearly all air
|
Ah, but the parts of the building that are not air, namely the massive colunms, should have given massive resistence even to the weight of the collapsing building. The free fall speed suggests that the undamaged columns didn't give any resistence. That's quite impossible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilbert
More instances of conspiracy theorist getting there quote wrong.
|
I'm sorry, when did I quote Romero? I'm more than aware of his flip floppage.