View Single Post
Old 09-18-2006, 07:40 AM   #566 (permalink)
Willravel
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
There is no need to defend it; fire is that hot, saying it isn’t just stupid. fastom has a fundamental misunderstanding of science, specifically but not limited to heat, temperature, and energy.
I was responding to Seaver, someone content to try and ride your coat tails and flame.

Fatsom said the fires were not 1500C, a fact that even Popular Mechanics agrees with:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Popular Mechanics
Anyone who says that jet fuel, even assisted by perfect burning conditions, can reach a temperature of 1500C, or 2732F, needs to revisit basic chemistry and physics. 1500F is about 815.56C, the number that most 9/11 conspiracy theorists and debunkers alike agree on. Unless you're ready to say that Popular Mechanics, the primary antagonit to 9/11 conspiracy theorists, is wrong, then I suggest we agree from here on that the fires could not have been higher than 815C if they were caused by and fueled by airplane fuel. Fatsom is right to point out that 1500C is an outragous number, and I give him props for sticking with it. If you continue to claim 1500C, then you should admit that the fure was not fueled by the egular contents of the WTC and the jet fuel. In essence, you'd have to admit foul play and thus join the dark side. You'd be welcomed with open arms, of course, but I don't see that happening.

Fatsom also mentioned the fire suppresing system, something that isn't often discussed. We don't know a lot about the sprinkler system, and it could play a large part in the science of our discussion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
Have you seen building schematics? There are pipes of water, vents, etc. Air pressure changing as the building collapses pushes air pressure down vents/pipes, those things have to go someplace especially in pipes since they are closed systems. Vents would be pusing air out, but eventually it would flow much more than it was designed for and push out greater amounts of air.

To see simply how this works take a garden hose and blow with your mouth from one end, then use a high pressure compressor on the same end and see the difference in how much distance the water goes from the other end.
The buildings fell at basically a free fall speed. Are you suggesting that the copllapsing debris and dust inside the building were moving fast that free fall speeds? Do you know how much pressure that would take?

Last edited by Willravel; 09-18-2006 at 07:42 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Willravel is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360