Beats the theory of the al Queda instigating the Mt. St. Helens erruption in 1980.
I think the bottom line is this:
There are aspects of the attack that don't add up. Amount of damage inflicted upon the Pentagon seems minimal. Answers and video released by the government are vague and scattered with fallacy. The immedeate melt-down of the WTC remains is strange (to me at least). The passport of one of the terrorist found on the rubble. WTC building 7. Censorship of some footage and commentary on the attacks. Conflicting reports on the elledged phone calls from flight 77. NORAD's three hour response delay. And the way the Bush administration took advantage of this tragic event to promote their own agenda; which is profoundly immoral either way. These things can be explained in many ways, and that's the problem.
We cannot agrue to a definitive point for either side until we have more information from the government. Discussion is fine, but I don't see us getting any further without that information.