Dilbert1234567

its hard not to, I’ve shown time and time again that planes could do the damage that was experience on 9/11, you are unconvinced, and I don’t think anything will convince you that 9/11 was perpetrated by Muslim radicals and not our own government. The evidence is overwhelming; everything that the conspiracy theorist comes up with is quashed by real research, real experts and real science. At this point I’m at a loss, things that should by now be obvious, aren’t.

we have an object about the size of a 757 flying low enough to clip light poles crash into the pentagon, it has to be wide enough to clip the number it did, and not wider otherwise it would have clipped more, the tone the object made changed as it hit one of the poles, a missile would not change the engine tone by hitting an obstacle, only a turbine engine, or possibly a rotary engine, does the missile theory also state that the government faked the sounds with large invisible speakers? Whether or not the plane hit the curb or not is really irrelevant, the impact is the size and shape of an engine, so presumably the engine hit it. Even if it didn’t it still does not matter.

So what if the there are some windows that are unbroken, the destruction the pentagon experience was correct for a plane of that size compared to the structure of the pentagon. The windows were 2 inches thick of bullet resistant glass; some would survive a crash. I’m sorry that you feel qualified to predict the exact path of the engine, but you are not, there are way too many variables to say with certainty that it hit the window, no one can, not even a computer simulation, there are to many unknown variables, especially because the engine suffered an impact from a light pole, which did an unknown amount of damage to it, possibly weakening the bolts attaching it to the wing.

__________________
Donate Blood!

"Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen