Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
The right engine stuck both a light pole on the road, and the generator outside of the pentagon. There are too many additional forces to calculate exactly where the engine would go, and just because it missed the window does not mean the plane does not exist.
|
I'm suggesting that the lack of any evidence of wing, engine, or tail damage in brick does raise, in my mind, the question of why and/or how. If you can prove to me that an aluminum plane traveling at over 500 miles per hour will not scratch brick, then we can move on.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
If you were unaware, the generator was the cause of the huge explosion seen on the video at the impact, not just the airplane, it’s the generator.
|
The generator was a small part of the explosion. A lot of it - I dare say most of it - was the expanding, igniting fuel.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
|
Hey! I watched all the videos!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
Further more, here is a new video I found of an f4 fighter slamming into a reinforced concrete wall at 500 mph, the wall is designed to move back to absorbed some of the forces, if it had not the plane and wall would have suffered more damage:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IM...er_impact2.wmv
When a light aluminum plane hits a solid wall, it gets smashed to bits. |
I don't know what material that wall was made from, but it clearly wasn't brick, and they also did not show what the wall looked like after the collission. I dare say that video is quite inconclusive when applied to the case of the Pentaqgon crash.