Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
ESTIMATED.. but not the ACTUAL, since the evidence points to the fact that an engine DID NOT hit the window. People wonder why it didn't hit the window. The fact is that it did NOT hit the window, plain and simple. No voodoo about it.
|
The estimated flight path is the only flight path available to the public. It's estimated based on the location of the hole, which is where the nose of the plane hit. Since we know where the nose hit, we know where the engines would have hit. When I say "estimated", it's only because we don't have the video to prove it. So where is your "ACTUAL" evidence coming from if the actual evidence is classified? Simple answer: no where. You're assuming you know the answer because you're assuming I'm wrong. The problem is that I'm right and you're ignoring me.
Would you care to post a link to the classified videos of the plane hitting the building?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
We can only agree on it if it was actually hit by it. the sillouhuette of a plane head on is very small, The area directly hit by it was severely damaged, but those that were not, no damage. Simple. Direct.
|
The sillouhuette would have been he size of a Boeing 757-200. That's bigger than a bread box. The problem is that the hole is too small.
See?