Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

dc_dux · 09-12-2006, 08:14 PM

Of Bush's "axis of evil," Iraq posed the least threat. Iran , with its fundamentalist regime was a the time of our invasion of Iraq, and continues to be a much greater state supporter of terrorism and North Korea has expanded its nuclear capabiliites and has a far greater need and willingess to sell to terrorists than Saddam everdid.

Yet, Bush spends $300 billion and still counting, tens of thousands of dead and injured, and Iraq is more unstable than ever.

Sorry, Ace....your analysis just doesnt wash by any rational standards.

BTW, I agree the liberator argument doesnt mean crap. And I hope you would agree that we demonstrated no viable plan to deal with the post-Saddam Baathist insurgency or sectarian violence, resulting in a vast majority of Iraqis increasngly turning against the US as more and more civilians die....a hell of a way to "establish a military foothold".

09-12-2006, 08:14 PM	#39 (permalink)
dc_dux Location: Washington DC	Of Bush's "axis of evil," Iraq posed the least threat. Iran , with its fundamentalist regime was a the time of our invasion of Iraq, and continues to be a much greater state supporter of terrorism and North Korea has expanded its nuclear capabiliites and has a far greater need and willingess to sell to terrorists than Saddam everdid. Yet, Bush spends $300 billion and still counting, tens of thousands of dead and injured, and Iraq is more unstable than ever. Sorry, Ace....your analysis just doesnt wash by any rational standards. BTW, I agree the liberator argument doesnt mean crap. And I hope you would agree that we demonstrated no viable plan to deal with the post-Saddam Baathist insurgency or sectarian violence, resulting in a vast majority of Iraqis increasngly turning against the US as more and more civilians die....a hell of a way to "establish a military foothold". __________________ "The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 09-12-2006 at 08:30 PM..