Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
This missle theory is based on the size of the entrance hole, the apparent lack of debris (which is an arguable point), and the circular hole in the rear that was only recently connected with the landing gear. Up until the recent Pop Mech 9/11 Conspiracy Theory book, the only story about the rear hole that's backable by testimony has been that it was created by the nose of the plane. I think we can all agree that the nose of the plane didn't make the rear hole, but it's arguable what did. The landing gear is a much more likely explaination that the nosecone, but the landing gear traveling so muhc farther than the engines is highly suspect. One landing arm cashes through sodozens of feet of steel reinforced concrete, but the other landing gear and the eingines don't even make it out of the first wing? I dunno, but that sounds suspecious. Add to that the testimony of the firefighters on the scene who said they saw what looked like the ffront of the plane, and we have a very confusing situation.
|
its really not that confusing when you go to real experts,
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/..._evidence.html
they also link to purdue univercities computer simulations of the impact,
http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/cmh/s...0sep02slow.gif
http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/cmh/simulation/
http://www.cs.purdue.edu/cgvlab/pape...gonVIS2003.mpg
The structure of the building literally tore the plane apart, not the other way around, like trying to shop a knife with a carrot, the carrot losses. The simulations are very good, they show how a plane could crash into the building and leave the damage experience by the building.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Oh dear. Tow inches of blast proof glass can withstand the direct impact of a titanium and aluminum engine traveling at 500+ mph speeds? Somehow I doubt that, espically when windows not in the direct path of the plane were broken from the explosion or the heat from the fire. That is a massive inconsistency of strength that was never addressed.
|
yeah, it can, it may be easier to push the window out of its frame then to destroy it, the windows are bullet and blast proof, blast proof means it will stop an explosive force from hurting people inside, rather then having the window shatter and spray the inside with glass, it deforms and pops out of its frame, sparing the people inside from the blast, and the shrapnel.