Quote:
|
Originally Posted by politicophile
You must have skipped over post #4. Also look at #7. Will said several things in #4 that implied he believed there was some sort of 9/11 conspiracy. I stated in no uncertain terms that I thought he was implying such a conspiracy and he responded with #7. Isn't the entire point of Host's thread to say that the numbers don't add up, that some pieces of the puzzle are being intentionally hidden, that there is a *gasp* conspiracy trying to prevent a comprehensive report of 9/11 from ever being created?
My Ann Coulter porn must be distracting me from the content of the thread, 'cause I thought I was squarely in the middle of "We-need-to-find-out-what Bush-actually-knew-on-9/11-and-when-he-knew-it" Land. Talk dirty to me, Ann!
|
I'm beginning to think we should stop using the word conspiracy, because it seems that some people equate the word conspiracy with the definition "untrue thing...". Conspiracies are real, and they happen every day. Every time you buy gas, every time you buy a Big Mac, you are supporting companies involved in conspiracies. They are commonplace, and have nothing to do with anal probing, mind reading aliens. If the president found out that a money trail from 9/11 lead right back to some of his buddies in Saudi Arabia, do you think he'd be shouting it from the rooftops?
Politicophile, I posted facts. Host posted facts. Do you have any disagreement over the facts? Do you think the 9/11 Commission investigation was a joke? Or do you take their corrupt, limited, and vague findings as being all that's necessary?