Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
It's good to know we have common ground. While the weasels have been responsible for such things as Woodstock, the invention of the telephone, and the building of the pyramids, they probably had nothing to do with the collapse of the WTC buildings, the Pentagon, or the other crash.
|
the Rand Corporation, in conjunction with the saucer people, under the supervision of the reverse vampires...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Well, if they had investigated the debris from the WTC instead of shipping it all off, we might have an answer. I think something has to be said about that.
|
You could not gather what temperature the fires burned at from the rubble, to many variables to deal with.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
The strange thing is, logic would dictate that more fuel was able to explode outward, burning off instantly and causeing the explosions we've seen in the videos. The explosion basically went right out the windows. Tower 2 fell faster than tower 1.
|
Tower 2 was hit in the corner of the central supports, weakening it more then the first tower, the fire was the ultimate cause, but the second tower was more damaged to begin with.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Then I explained that the outward expansion would actually make the beam connections stronger against the outside supports.
|
Unfortunately, no it would not. As the beams expanded, they push the outer wall out; therefore, instead of the floors above being directly above, they are at an angle, albeit slight, this weakens the structure severely. Just as my old soda can example, you can stand on a soda can, as long as the sides are perfect, as soon as you warp one, the can will collapse, just like the building.