View Single Post
Old 09-06-2006, 05:39 PM   #19 (permalink)
Mark23
Upright
 
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Ch'i,

I'm afraid I don't understand where you are coming from. If you are saying that you took 10 minutes to travel 3 miles, then you could quite possibly be using a bicycle, a scooter, jogging (albeit very fast), or even a tractor. I don't see what this has to do with modern science. Statistically there may be more chance of you having cycled, but this is not scientific. The only thing science can (and would) say is that you are travelling on average at a speed of 18 miles per hour.

It surprises me that you find many other equally fuctional possibilities as answers to ideas in modern science. I can find none, the reason being that as other possibilities are uncovered, they are tested and the best fitting solution is selected as the most probable answer. Of course, it's possible that better fitting solutions are available, but you seem to imply that they are readily available and easy to think of, and they are not.

Your example works because you don't supply us with any evidence about your means of transport, so many suitable hypothesis' exist. Bicycle tyre tracks left behind en route to your destination would help us to form a single hypothesis, specifically naming the bicycle as your mode of transport.

With regard to the question about faith, I would suspect that most people wish to ascribe a higher meaning to things that occur. I don't find the analogy of the lightening bolt reaching from the ground to the sky and visa-versa at all impressive, as it seems to imply some kind of godly reciprocation of the faith his followers have. There is certainly no evidence for the existence of god, nor is there any against his existence, but it is important to realise that the two are not on some kind of equal footing. There are a infinite number of different things we cannot disprove, yet most of us don't believe in the vast majority of any of them, so why is god any different from say, the existence of leprechauns?

I suspect the answer has something to do with comfort, and fear of death. Humans are, and always have been, arrogant, self-centred and have placed far too much importance on the role they play in the cosmos. Hence the reason why the majority of religions have notions of a paradise afterlife and attribute a great sense of purpose to human beings. It is important to remember that just because something appears nice and comforting bears no reflection on whether it is true or false; this is something that a lot of people don't seem to realise.

Last edited by Mark23; 09-06-2006 at 05:45 PM.. Reason: grammar
Mark23 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360