Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
......so......I'll request again that Ustwo (or Marv....or anyone...)provide a credible argument to back the WaPo's incredible editorial statment:
<i>"It follows that one of the most sensational charges leveled against the Bush White House -- <b>that it orchestrated the leak of Ms. Plame's identity to ruin her career and thus punish Mr. Wilson -- <b>is untrue</b>"</i>
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Fool me once, fool me twice willravel. Now that Rove, the demon of left wing nightmares is out of the picture as a target, they will switch to Cheney's aid in hope that they can get something to stick. Your post did get me to do something I rarely do these days and read one of hosts scroll button inducing posts, or more specificily the longest quoted piece in one of them. I saw a heck of a lot of rehashing for the Niger yellow cake information, but very little/nothing that would like Cheney (the real target) with leaking the Plame information. The fact that Cheney would take interest and try to explain, discredit, downplay, whatever Wilsons report should not be shocking nor is it an issue here.
The angle of course will be that Cheney ordered Libby to release the information about Plame, which still hits the 'why bother' wall. If your goal is to discredit "Wilson's" report, having the general public know his wife was in the CIA does nothing to help your cause.
|
....and here, the thread will sit.....because my "request" will be met with negative personal innuendo directed at me, but no response to support the premise of this thread's OP.....it's sad and disconserting, that this "technique" of avoidance, intended to pass for credible rebuttal, is posted so unabashedly.....and actually receives acceptance and support, as will be evident in future posts here!