Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ratbastid
YAY FOR DISTRACTIONS!
Please, nobody notice this: There was still no fucking yellowcake. We still killed tens of thousands and thousands of people for a lie.
|
Distractions are certainly evident here. The post is about who "outed" Valerie Plame, and we get host going off about WMDs and Nixon, and you going off about yellowcake.
BTW, the matter you refer to should accurately be described as an attempt to
GET yellowcake, something that Bush-haters don't like to see clarified, since it actually happened. But you get points for diversionary tactics. And all this time we've been hearing about the REPUBLICANS who try to divert discussion from the actual topic.
Let's have some more of the good, the bad, and the ugly.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dc_dux
Ustwo...I think you are missing the bigger issue. Its not who outed Plame; its just another example of how this administration uses or abuses intellligence information to selectively represent or misrepresent the facts to further support a political agenda.
|
Wait--this thread
IS about who outed Plame!!! Remember--that was the entire justification for the proposed execution of Rove, castration of Cheney, and impeachment of Bush.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
How can an executive branch that leaks classified information and then covers it up at the highest levels, avoid congressional investigation? I cannot accept a shadow president (Rove) who commits a treasonous act, or a president who would follow closley and consistantly the direction of such a man.
Impeach Bush !!!!!
|
I absent-mindedly reached for a Kleenex when I read this one. I was certain my face HAD to have been sprayed with spittle.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by djtestudo
I'm very interested in how you can get "'Bush's Brain' scrambling to avoid Indictment for Treasonous Act" from an article simply stating Rove is appearing before the grand jury without any protection from procecution.
Hell, the only way that title could be considered in any way accurate was if he REFUSED to appear without protection.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by docbungle
I fail to see how this can be viewed as anything other than Rove saying, "No problem. I'll testify again; I have nothing to hide."
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by powerclown
I'm having visions of....massive, writhing hordes of Lefties pleasuring themselves in dark corners right about now.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pan6467
Hey, i don't know about anyone else, but i usually leave the lights on for politically fueled masturbation. Makes reading the newspaper easier. 
Personally, I watch tapes of those hotties Ann Coulter and Greta Van and dream I'm the liberal filling in a Conservative Oreo. |
Okay, now that was funny.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Superbelt
From what I've read, he's going in voluntarially because they asked for him.
They asked for him to return because his story changes a little every day and apparently isn't jiving with what Judy Miller is saying.
So, looks like they are giving him one last chance to get his story straight before they go ahead and frogmarch his crooked ass.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
IMO, you can stick a fork in Rove....he's "done".
|