Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
No conflict, I'm right. Either way it has nothing to do with abortion. Whether it does or doesn't prevent implantation, it doesn't actually do anything after implantation, so it's not abortion. It walks right up to the line, but it doesn't cross it.
|
But it's not clear that there's a significant moral difference.
Quote:
It matters because it's the difference between a contraceptive and an abortion. *snip*
|
But what moral difference is there between an abortion and a contraceptive that prevents implantation? I don't see one, unless you're going by the viability criterion (and I don't).
Quote:
What do YOU define as the beginning of pregnancy, and what credentials do you have that supercede the whole medical community?
|
I'm not interested in a semantics argument. I accept this definition of pregnancy. I do not accept that the start of pregnancy, as defined, is morally significant.
Quote:
Do these pills promote reckless and irresponsible behavior? Of course.
|
That's not my concern in this thread. My concern is whether reckless and irresponsible behavior endangers human life. Now it looks like it does.