What an interesting reply, Analog.
My belief that this pill doesn't require an age restriction is based upon the scientific evidence within the agency, that has been ignored by political appointees. But I already stated that in my first post:
Quote:
|
The scientific community found nothing to suggest that this pill could be harmful to young women under 18, and certainly birth control pills are available for girls through their doctor.
|
The ability of teens to get around the age restriction of this pill or any other age restricted item was merely a comment on how unlikely I think it will be to enforce this plan.
Faulty thinking? I believe the term "straw man" adequately describes your response. But *that* might be faulty thinking on my part. I responded to your topic in the spirit of respect for the OP. It would appear that it is best that I refrain from posting to your topics. Easily done and not a problem for me.