Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
But see, I have spoken to engineers as well, from mechinical to structural, industrial to manufacturing. The[y] all see that it's quite possible to have happened as it did without intervention of a conspiracy group.
|
We interveined with the collapse?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
There is one part that is missing from your load capacity theory and that is motion. Once the material is in motion it no longer can withstand the load as such because the load isn't incremental it is instant. So while you may be able to hold the load a 100lb bag of cement in your arms, it falling at differenet speed than just being "transferred" you cannot hold that same load.
|
I have no doubt that the plane did damage going in. I have no doubt the initial explosion did damage. I do have doubt that a collapsed building that's top floor collapsed first was made to collapse by damage in the middle. I do have doubts that the heat from fire that would be most intense and thus most hot in the middle of the building would cause the top floor to collapse first. I do doubt that any amount of fire damage, impact damage, and a combination of the two, could cause a building as strong as the WTC towers to collapse at near free fall speeds.