View Single Post
Old 08-18-2006, 08:23 PM   #51 (permalink)
1010011010
Psycho
 
1010011010's Avatar
 
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
The first month would be the hardest as various systems that previously had been running autonomously finally failed. The sheer amount of crap that would catch on fire in an urban area would make being able to move and move quickly a priority... So stock up a vehicle with survival kit and keep it nearby.

Once things stopped working, though, life would be pretty easy. Any of the big chain convenience stores that survived the fires would have enough non-perishable stuff to feed and supply a single human for years. Might be a good idea to get a gas mask for after the meat and produce have turned.

I'd stock up a utility van with basic survival kit and go somewhere with a nice year-round climate. Read a lot of books. Watch a lot of DVDs. Do a lot of drugs. Make the occassional trip to places I normally wouldn't be allowed to go just to see what was hidden there. Not a lot to it.

Re: Inbreeding and rebuilding the human race.
Returning cryogenically preserved ova and semen to a viable state isn't a matter of putting them out on the counter to thaw. Also, without a regular delivery of liquid nitrogen, they wouldn't be cryogenically perserved within a few days.
You might succeed in getting yourself pregnant and having one child. If that child happened to be male you can try it again in 12-15 years, assuming you both survive the birth and he survives childhood. If that child is female, oh well, tough shit. If you happen to be male... what exactly were you planning on doing with those embryos? Keep them in a shoebox for nine months?
Genetic diversity isn't as big of a problem as you might think. Instill in your offspring the pragmatic importance of culling the herd and the necessity of everybody getting down with everybody else. This will lead to some really fucked up ethical systems for several hundred years if you succeed in establishing a breeding population, but you'll be dead.
I don't think it's worth the trouble, and I'm male so I wouldn't have the option of trying it, anyway.

Nuclear power plants might continue operating unsupervised for several months. There's minimal risk of catastrophic failure under plausible initial conditions. They would probably end up damaged beyond reoperability by their own decay heat when they finally did shutdown, but I doubt anyone would ever be trying a start-up on one again, anyway.
__________________
Simple Machines in Higher Dimensions
1010011010 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360