View Single Post
Old 08-02-2006, 12:05 PM   #2 (permalink)
Frosstbyte
Winter is Coming
 
Frosstbyte's Avatar
 
Location: The North
When you are a minor and in a school, your constitutional rights are somewhat abridged. Lots of schools have rules against kids wearing shirts with swear words and advertisements about drugs and alcohol on them because they are considered disruptive. I knew of one person when I was in high school who was suspended for wearing a shirt with a racial slur on it. Is this somehow different?

I mean, sure, the wording is relatively "polite" insofar as it doesn't say "God condemns all you ass-fucking fags to burn in hell," but the message is essentially the same.

The first amendment right to free speech is not absolute and does not protect you from all consequences of your exercise of free speech. It says "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech . . ." It says nothing about a school making a rule that you can't wear t-shirts that are offensive. Try showing up to a client meeting in an office wearing a bikini, covered in feces and hungover. If you did and got fired, you'd have a tough case for saying that your employers had violated your first amendment rights.

Codes of conduct exist all over the place. Public schools have them and they are much more strict than what the first amendment allows. This kid violated that code of conduct (I'd assume knowingly) and got busted. Seems pretty clear to me. The ruling doesn't say he can't wear it at home or on the street or in a park or to church or that it must be burned as offensive to all good Americans. It says that this t-shirt violated this school's rules and those rules allow for a constitutional abridgement of first amendment rights under Tinker. Every court reading that decision subsequently would read it that narrowly. He didn't make it a rule that no one can wear t-shirts that criticize gay lifestyles.

There are plenty of people in the government right now that you should be worried about infringing on your constitutional rights. Reinhardt's upholding of a school rule intended to prevent people from wearing inappropriate and offensive clothing in the class room probably isn't the one to be going after.

Last edited by Frosstbyte; 08-02-2006 at 12:19 PM..
Frosstbyte is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360