Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Ummm thats the first article and no one was charged with that, its just what the family said the police said. The second article is the one that matters, the first is really quite pointless from a legal stand point.
|
By "pointless" you mean that in the first article the police were clearly at fault? From a legal standpoint, some kid was dragged from his own property and arrested for taking a picture of a public occourance. Where I come from, that's called illegal. Shouldn't the police be heald responsible for their actions? Aren't laws supposed to protect the innocent?