Quote:
|
My question is: has there ever been a time in US history (aside from the Civil War which was led by another government anyway) when there has been a genuine need or situation where the people should have risen up in some form of armed statement? A situation that might have been resolved in a more satisfactory manner than negotiation or acquiessence (or whatever did eventually resolve the situation) had the people pulled out their rifles and protested against the government in such a fashion.
|
The quick settlement of lands from the coast to Pacific coast was made possible only by gun ownership. While it lead to the total defeat of Indian tribes, it was fundamental in the developement of what America is today.
Many of our regiments all the way up to the 21st Century were based almost entirely on an individual's experience with weaponry. Scouts, snipers, even entire regiments were volunteer basis supported completely by prior experience with guns. From the Revolution, to the various settlement wars, to 1812... in every single engagement even up to today.
Very few people join the military without firing a gun previously. While this can easily be trained, prior experience with weaponry is a great aid.
To your question about has there been any time where an armed statement. It's not about whether there has been a successful one, but whether we should have at least some sort of ability of resistance.