Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kittie Rose
Can we PLEASE get some kind of forum rule against this form of arguing? It's very close to trolling, quoting someone's argument and then telling them exactly what it isn't in a blatant attempt to frustrate them, but insisting it is anyway. Complete Strawman.
|
Read the rest of my post and not just what you want to read. Anyone can take a single sentence and stretch it out of context.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kittie Rose
That quote was in no way out of context. He did force on his opposition the position that men should have no right in any parenthood related decisions such as the ones mentioned when he knew it wasn't true. That's an aggressive strawman and a form of trolling. Not an "Opinion".
|
Quite the opposite. I believe that men should have some rights in the issue of fatherhood, as opposed to the no choice they have now. A man can't force a woman into motherhood against her will, yet a women can force a man into fatherhood against his will. I don't agree with that. It takes two to make a baby, so both should get some type of equal say in the issue of parenthood. It shouldn't be 100 - 0 in favor of the woman.
Just to clarify, I don't believe that all men should turn into deadbeats and skip out on their child support, nor do I believe in the "Eye for an eye" view (You know, "Two wrongs don't make a right"). I do believe, though, that men should be given a bit more say in the issue of parenthood.