Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ace_O_Spades
I haven't visited the site yet, and I don't really plan to, but that doesn't make my comment any less pertinent:
If a website writes a non-opinion piece citing reputable sources and drawing logical conclusions, do you think the overall bias of the site will still make the points they make invalid?
Not all articles from a given site can be immediately discredited. It just gives you a little more warning to check that what you're citing is actually worth citing as opposed to simply an opinion. Ad hominem attacks don't suffice.
The scientific method doesn't care about your political views.... it serves us all equally.
|
It should be up to those who believe what that website professes as truth to verify it as truth. As it is an untrustworthy site, accepting it at face value is silly. I have used such sites before but only to focus on where to look for the truth. If their stories can not be verified then they should be discounted.
In other words, no one should get their panties in a bunch over what is in a very biased, very political web site without some sort of independent corroboration.