We all are in armchairs roach, attaching "Bush" to this beat metaphor and attributing it to the "other side" doesn't elevate you to a position beyond that.
It's a word who's meaning hasn't been fear-mongered into me. It all seems quite clear and not that complicated. Religious zealots of the Islamic persuasion, tantamount to those that would have quiet time in American public schools for prayer if one would be so inclined, are to poor to fight a real war so they use any and all means necessary to scare the populous. ANY AND ALL MEANS.<----Terrorism in a nutshell.
For whatever reason the leftists of the western world, sheltered in their educational institutions and unwittingly duped by their tendancy to think too much (source: read posts 1-19 of this thread)...okay so maybe i'm going overboard, but christ if at this point you (and by that I mean what is apparently the left in this country) really can't figure out who the terrorists are thank god your not running the country.
One final thought....with all of the education and thoughtfullness floating around in this thread over the meaning of one single word, you really can't come up with any other alternatives for why better than half of the populous in this country agree on the definition of terrorism other than "bush propaganda and fear mongering". Can we start debating the meaning of "idealogy"?
On second thought, never mind...I give up, you win.
|