Quote:
|
Originally Posted by magictoy
Points are awarded for honesty in each of these posts:
This quote from the OP interests me greatly:
Since Plame's identity was already known all over the world, and since other countries will now be more reluctant to help us in our fight against terrorism, my decision on which offense was more significant is clear.
It's also clear to me that the Post and the Times have much greater concern about their circulation than the safety of Americans, or the fight against terrorism.
|
Can you please direct us to where we can examine support or documentation that,
Quote:
|
Since Plame's identity was already known all over the world
|
,
and from what date that was a reliable (accurate) statment to make?
It's curious that you posted no opinion on the documented revelation that Tony Snow, and Treasury undersecretary Levey told obvious lies about whether or not the U.S. government's monitoring of "SWIFT" was a secret.
They both firmly stated:
Quote:
|
.....the fact that terrorists didn't know it existed. They may have heard us talking about "following the money," but they didn't know that we were obtaining terrorist-related data from SWIFT. Many may not have even known what SWIFT was.
|
&
Quote:
|
MR. SNOW: I am absolutely sure they didn't know about SWIFT.
|
magictoy, vs. your statement,
Quote:
|
........It's also clear to me that the Post and the Times have much greater concern about their circulation than the safety of Americans, or the fight against terrorism.
|
Please explain what is "clear" to you....an example of what "the Post and the Times" did, that concerns you more than the reality of Mr. Snow and Mr. Levey, lying and misleading the world. Who were they authorized to speak for, when they made those untrue statements?