Originally Posted by willravel

You have an amazing sense of humor. Thank you for sharing it.

And the sky is blue. The bottom line is that there exists something called the FISA court, an entity that is responsible for greenlighting surveillance, so as to avoid misuse of power by the surveilers. That court was bypassed for whatever reason. The arguments about the legality of the program are still being debated. What does this tell me? Simple. This program is potentially illegal, and we wouldn't know about this potentially illegal program had it not been for the NYT. They uncovered potentially illegal actions. How is that not a rational justification? Partisan issues aside for one milisecond. Could it be possible that they have done good?

I enjoy the fact you ascert that becuase these people have opinions, they are completly devoid of loyalty to their country and are willing to aid the enemy. That's quite a fantastic leap.