|
As doubtful as I am about the official story of 9/11 by now, I just can't believe something other than a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon. It seems like a pretty big risk to fly some military plane (or, god forbid, an actual missile) into a building next to a highway with hundreds of cars passing a minute, then try to claim it was a 757. Why?
A single person in one of those cars who happened to have a camera rolling for some reason could have accidentally captured the whole event (noone did, sadly enough) and blown the whole setup. I don't think even the most crazy evil conspirator would take a risk like that.
It has been suggested that the "no-plane" stories are actually misinformation by the conspirators, the military-occult complex, etc. That may seem paranoid but it does look to me like a lot of misguided effort has been aimed at these kinds of theories that only serve to muddy the waters of the whole debate, and provide excellent chance for mainstream media to further marginalize the believers among us.
I mean, every time 9/11 conspiracies come up in the mainstream, it's almost always about the "a missile hit the pentagon" or "the planes that struck the WTC were holograms" stories; almost never about the real meaty questions like "why in the blue fuck did WTC 7 collapse as it did" and "why the hell weren't any of the planes intercepted by fighter jets".
Don't get hung up on that silliness, people. A lot of weird things happened that day but I'm pretty sure there weren't any missiles or holograms involved.
__________________
You don't know what you don't know.
|