View Single Post
Old 07-04-2006, 07:24 PM   #10 (permalink)
liquidlight
AHH! Custom Title!!
 
liquidlight's Avatar
 
Location: The twisted warpings of my brain.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
Um, wow, just wow... currently the AMD core is just a tiny bit better then Intel's core, but that all changes when the Conroe come out, the Conroe is simply spanking amd. hothardware and tomshardware got some pre releases of the conroe 2.66GHz and in both cases they had huge increases against the FX-62 and FX-60, for gaining, between 25% and 50% higher frame rates. further more, the conroe was not the fastest that will be available, at release they are slated to go as high as 2.93 ghz
Dilbert, you forgot one VERY important thing. . . I mentioned a price of $500 for the chip/board, if you look at comparable cores around $300 the AMD chips are pretty superior for everything gaming related, Intel barely eeks out a lead for certain desktop publishing apps.

I wish I had $800 (FX-60) to $1200 (FX-62) to spend on a core!
__________________
Halfway to hell and picking up speed.
liquidlight is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73