Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tecoyah
...... Now to my question:
Though it is likely North Korea now has a limited Nuclear ability (unconfirmed, but implied), would it not be in the best interest of all involved to pull an "Iraq"....and remove the threat before they can become a serious threat to ourselves, and our allies?
|
tecoyah, you're not thinking big enough. IMO, time is running out for the "home team"...the good ole USA.....
I've covered the "big picture" strategy of pre-emption on this thread:
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthr...97#post2073997
in these posts:
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showpos...6&postcount=24
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showpos...4&postcount=26
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showpos...7&postcount=28
...and I don't recall any response to those posts from you.
Do you believe that it is better for the U.S. to "work it's way up" to what it really must do if it hopes to be the sole super power ten years from now, by dealing with the NK "threat" via a pre-emptive strike, now?
Why not seriously dicuss the pros and cons of sweeping the little shits like NK and Iran "up", in a one time, blanket ultimatum, while the U.S. still has the best odds of pulling off world domination via the submission or destruction of REAL adversaries....China and Russia?