|
Also bear in mind that women say they like and what actually makes them hot under the collar can be wildly different. I've read a few items on this and watched a documentary last year. The women were all hooked up to pulse, blood pressure and "other" monitors and shown the kind of porn women _report_ that they prefer (VERY broad generalisation) and a little later they were shown the porn that men say they prefer.
Obviously, differences in the relative 'hardness' of the porn and plotlines etc, etc are easy to draw. Ladies, please dont shout at me.
Anyway, as the premise marks out, all the women reported to prefer the more romantic and softer porn, though they were not particularly aroused by it - some women were actually completely unmoved by it though they claimed to have really enjoyed it. The real, marked physical reaction was noted on a pretty low grade, seedy representation of an older man taking a young girl in a barn or some such. Very graphic, very explicit, all possible penetration penetrated.
Thousands of years of inbred denial of their sexual selves has left its mark...
I have no idea what this will do to contribute, but it just seems relevant to me.
__________________
"I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937 --{ORLY?}--
|